Rk Team gp g a gpg s pim ppg ppo pp% ppga tsh pk% shg shga ga gaa sv sv% en
1 Aquinas 20 61 86 3.05 725 362 9 60 15.0 19 112 83.0 7 3 88 4.37 703 .889 2
2 Cleary (MI) 32 101 153 3.16 1037 623 26 147 17.7 44 155 71.6 6 4 129 4.01 1152 .899 4
3 Concordia (MI) 38 138 215 3.63 1549 571 42 180 23.3 30 149 79.9 5 1 120 3.13 1247 .912 3
4 Indiana Tech 31 173 266 5.58 1021 449 49 140 35.0 18 89 79.8 9 0 55 1.77 651 .922 0
5 Lawrence Tech 25 114 125 4.56 868 516 22 106 20.8 18 158 88.6 10 0 52 2.06 623 .923 1
6 Michigan-Dearborn 37 154 232 4.16 1162 348 23 146 15.8 20 103 80.6 1 1 99 2.66 1088 .917 1
6 Rochester 19 20 30 1.05 356 318 6 53 11.3 35 91 61.5 1 2 176 9.26 1095 .862 1
Rk Team gp g a gpg s pim ppg ppo pp% ppga tsh pk% shg shga ga gaa sv sv% en
1 Aquinas 19 59 83 3.11 686 345 9 58 15.5 18 106 83.0 6 3 85 4.46 660 .886 2
2 Cleary (MI) 24 76 116 3.17 764 439 20 108 18.5 35 106 67.0 6 3 93 3.86 881 .905 4
3 Concordia (MI) 24 80 134 3.33 947 296 29 124 23.4 16 87 81.6 2 0 74 3.07 745 .910 2
4 Indiana Tech 19 107 171 5.63 705 282 33 93 35.5 11 60 81.7 4 0 38 2.00 396 .912 0
5 Lawrence Tech 15 52 59 3.47 461 316 12 62 19.4 11 87 87.4 3 0 29 1.92 400 .932 1
6 Michigan-Dearborn 24 118 177 4.92 957 206 18 109 16.5 12 74 83.8 1 1 55 2.28 657 .923 1
6 Rochester 16 19 28 1.19 310 258 6 41 14.6 28 77 63.6 1 2 144 9.00 917 .864 1